Reviews
AMR23
2 months ago
0.1
La souillasse
3 years ago
1.2
Rata K
3 years ago
1.6
Tit la fine bulle
4 years ago
3.5
Cervoisier des Ases
4 years ago
1.0
Ricleo
4 years ago
1.2
Similaire Kronenbourg etc... Rien de bien intéressant
Mathieu J
5 years ago
2.0
Huginn
5 years ago
2.5
Plutôt correcte reste meilleure que la kro ou la h celon moi , et moins cher
Cyril B
6 years ago
1.5
WexiLahti
@ Utile, rue Pairolière6 years ago
1.2
Clear, pale golden beer with restrained, quick carbonation leaves on the surface a white cotton head that well exceeds one finger and melts soon down to a thin lacing on top.
The scent is first bluffingly cannabic. That distinct aroma fades soon somewhat to the background but keeps on lingering as a hempen note much longer. A hoppy, grassy aroma emerges instead.
The tongue is relatively indifferent to the thin, bulky gustatory palette. Overall, the package is loose and uninspiring. Pale malt is watery, and the meager hops don't save much of the ruined first impression. Further impairment comes when one tastes the sweeter maize adjunct. Not again...!
The scanty-bodied beer ends almost immediately with very light-hopped, pale malty taste that suffers from the same maize starch as what already destroyed the expectations upfront. A bit sugary, biscuity and faintly lemony hints are given in the aftertaste.
The mouthfeel is thin, unispiring and watery. It's also artificially adjuncted, industrial and easy.